Travel update and thoughts on wardrobe size (long)

A few weeks ago I posted my travel capsule and a few outfits. I was gone for a little over a month. I had laundry facilities available. I also had varied activities (from hiking to presentations at a conference and a public reading) and lots of weather to contend with. Including plenty of snow. 

Despite my ability to do laundry, if you look at my list in that post, you'll notice that I in no way achieved Claire's ...um...clarity.

Her 10 item capsule wardrobe has always appealed to a part of me -- and you'd think a trip like this would be the perfect opportunity to put it into play. But somehow, I couldn't bring myself to do it -- and I'd really like to try to understand why.

I brought at least 27 items along on this trip -- and that doesn't count some of the gear, the shoes, the belts, scarves, and bags. That sounds like a lot, doesn't it? 

Even so, if you look at my outfits...you will see a lot of repetition. I didn't even take photos every day, because really, I was wearing the same top with different jeans, or vice versa. Admittedly, part of the repetition was because I had to do a lot of layering. It was colder than expected, so I wore more of my items together with other items than I might have done in a warmer year. And that meant my few sweaters got a huge amount of wear. 

In fact, the only things I didn't wear at all were two light coloured linen tees, brought in case of warmer temperatures. (I did wear two darker coloured ones). The dresses were only worn twice each -- but that is pretty much what I expected given the range of activities. I only got to wear my Okalas twice -- again, due to temps. Everything else I wore (and washed) multiple times. 

So...here's the thing. On a daily basis I saw far more people than I see in my regular life. Some rotated, and some were the same people every day. Regardless,  I didn't mind the fact that they were seeing me in the same or similar clothes all the time. In fact, it didn't enter my mind that it might be a problem. So worry about other people's reactions is not my reason for wanting a larger wardrobe. 

Also, I liked the ease of simply putting on my FFB shirt-or-sweater-with-jeans. After all, this is my work-at-home uniform, too, so it felt easy and comfortable, and I felt presentable and prepared for all situations I encountered. And although the setting was uber-casual, I brought along several of my favourite higher-end items (including my Reiss jacket and some premium jeans) and truly enjoyed wearing them. 

And yet, by the time I got home I was so happy to be able to choose something else!!

This makes me think that even while a part of me longs for the simplicity of 10 (or maybe even 20) items -- it's not likely to work for me over the long term -- unless I simply replaced most of those ten items every season (because, like Susie, I have a very strong tendency to reach for my newest items first when I get dressed.) 

At minimum, I would probably seek to replace most of the tops and/ or dresses -- I really can't see replacing jackets/ coats/ or even pullovers/ jeans every year. And I'm not sure that would be any more cost-effective or helpful to the environment. 

It's a real dilemma, this business of figuring out how much is enough. I so admire Claire and Lisa and all the rest of you who are trying to do this. I guess I will continue to muddle along for now, but I would really like to get a clearer handle on what will work best for me and keep my wardrobe within those limits. 

Thanks for reading these long ramblings if you have got this far. And I would love to hear any thoughts you might have. 

Some of the outfits, below, along with some of the neighbours. :) 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
This post is also published in the youlookfab forum. You can read and reply to it in either place. All replies will appear in both places.

43 Comments

  • Laura (rhubarbgirl) replied 10 years ago

    Suz, you're back! *hugs you from afar* I hope your residency (conference? workshop? sabbatical?) was great and you got the time you wanted to work on your writing. I read Claire's recent post with awe and a litany of "but, but, but..." falling from my lips. Like you, there's a part of me to whom the minimalist wardrobe appeals, and I keep on wondering why I can't make it work for me.

    Looking at your pics and thinking about the evolution of your style, it seems like in many ways you have simplified a lot. Your silhouettes are pretty constant, and you've figured out what works for your lifestyle and your figure, not to mention your climate. But clearly you still want some novelty, as do I, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I always get itchy at the end of a long trip and happily wear different clothes for a while when I get home, even if there was nothing wrong with the clothes I packed.

  • unfrumped replied 10 years ago

    Fun review! I hope you had a great time on your trip.
    I'm pretty sure I'm  also not driven by worry that someone else will think I don't have enough variety or wear the same outfits or items. See Ingunn's post which relates to this.
    I think my wardrobe is too big based on my impression that I'm not wearing all of my items in the season they're meant for or only wearing some once or twice. I think it has more to do with items  not being exactly what I think should go, or exact comfort level, or also proportions--so that maybe many are not really "10's" so I keep looking. For some people it might be that 4 dresses each serve a slightly different purpose whereas for me it might be that if each dress really checked all the boxes I wanted, I would need only 2 of them.

    That is where I'm realizing  I actually want more versatility, without going all the way to tyranical versatility. At some level versatility to me is a "10" concept in that the item is inherently so right and "comfortable" (physical and emotional) that you are able to wear it for several types of occasions and not worry that it's a little too much this or not enough that.

    The second thing is that I'll duplicate or semi-duplicate items and like them, but then each one is worn less, so again, wardrobe could be smaller with the same impact.

  • Nicola replied 10 years ago

    I always enjoy seeing the outfits you put together. Your work at home 'uniform' is after my own heart and it was from reading one of your posts a while ago that I realised how much I love jeans and feel blissfully happy wearing them every day in cooler weather. A minor epiphany maybe, but after having brief affairs with other trousers it was an aha moment to return my first love!

    But back on topic...I'm the same. The idea of a simple curated wardrobe really appeals to me but I love variety. I'll happily wear the same combinations for a while and then desperately crave a new twist. My scarf collection satisfies some of that. Actually, now I come to think of it, accessories make all the difference to me. I mean, I'll happily wear the same two (to four!!!) pairs of boots all winter and then get them resoled. Just as long as I can tweak outfits and add some new things each season. That makes all the difference.

  • replied 10 years ago

    Great outfits --- I hope you had an enjoyable and productive time!

  • Mo replied 10 years ago

    I noticed your absence but didn't know you were on a trip.  I am forever trying to distill the 'how much is enough' without being wasteful dilemma.  I have decided I need to instead of duplicating similar silhouettes or fabrications in different colors, that I need to branch out and do a truly different look.  IE: silky shorts instead of yet another cotton/chino pair in a different color.
    No time to comment more closely on your looks right now, but so glad you're back!

  • Ingunn replied 10 years ago

    You look as fashionable and put together as ever, cold weather or not! I think you have developed a very unique to you style over the last year or so, and it is. so. fab. I hear you about the 10-item wardrobe. I know I want to do it, but it's impossible. I would become bored, and I would be replacing at the same rate, or even faster. That's who I am, unfortunately. I crave variety and novelty. 

  • texstyle replied 10 years ago

    Yay, you're back!  Missed your outfit posts. So glad you had a safe trip. What I think I noticed most when I browsed these photos, beside the fact that you look sensational in all of them, is that the shoes (the white converse) stood out to me more than the other items!  Not what I expected, but then again, they are white so they do tend to stand out. I think I'm just shoe-focused these days. I also feel that I do like "new" things and could not just stick with the same rotation *all* the time, but I sure would like to have 10 great outfits each season to rotate  for days when I don't want to think about it.

  • shedev replied 10 years ago

    I especially love the navy, white, and jean outfits. I really admire those who have curated the very minimal wardrobes, but I know I need more. I'm still working on how much more.

  • Angie replied 10 years ago

    Yay. SUZ IS BACK. Missed you so much, darling lady. xo

    And thanks for this enlightening post. You wore your Cons till the cows came home - elegantly and with sass every time. Fabulous casual outfits - of course. Euro Chic, you are. Love #2, #10 and #13 best. Nice to see the new blazer come out to play. You look killer in that frock. You are a super stylish lass. 

    Good grief. I hear you on not wanting to wear the items I take on holiday with me for a looooong time after I get back. And I LOVE reaching for new things like you do. 

    Part of my own fun with fashion is to shop, try the trends, refresh, experiment, and remix. After all - the Rag Trade is my livelihood. I just loooooooove it so much. I also love to keep fab stuff for years -  I am always proud of that fact when I mention it in blog posts. To have a 10 item wardrobe would be absolute punishment for me, and no fun at all. Of course, I respect that it works for Claire wholeheartedly. My wardrobe limit is my closet size - and I am very strict about that. No overflowing into other closets ever. And things must stay very neat and visible at all times. So I do believe in a small wardrobe - but my small is different to Claire's small.

    We have to implement what works for us. Horses for courses - always. The most important thing is to WEAR YOUR CLOTHES, feel great in them, and have fun along the way. 

  • mrseccentric replied 10 years ago

    (massive Suz love fit)

    okay, now that THAT's over.....heeheheee! :)

    Suz, i get that you really like the IDEA of a small wardrobe. But i don't understand what about your wardrobe the way it is right now that isn't working for you? 

  • Suz replied 10 years ago

    Thank you all! 

    Angie, I can wholeheartedly attest that I DO wear my clothes -- every single item. And most of them, I wear a lot -- anywhere from three or four times a week (certain jeans and/or jackets and shoes) to once or twice a month (within the item's season).  If I am not wearing something, I always ask myself why. Typically I discover that the weather has not been right for it. That (to me) suggests that I'm actually buying well, and in decent amounts, but that I live in an unpredictable climate. The only exceptions are my more special occasion pieces -- those I might not wear for a season -- but then all of a sudden I'll have 3 occasions in a row and they'll get lots of use. 

    I really did wear my Cons like crazy!!! They were the PERFECT shoe. Okay with socks indoors in the cooler temps on snowy days. (I wore my Goretex trail runners if I was out on the mountain or hiking). Okay in warmer temps without socks. Good with full length or rolled up trousers. I would have worn them with a dress if the temps had allowed more dress wearing. The soles were "grippy" which was an excellent quality on sloping, slippery roads and paths. 

    That brings me to a question, actually -- I wore these so much that I wore them out! They are starting to fray, and my polished style persona isn't happy about that. But I can't find a replacement pair in N. America!

    Texstyle -- you're right those shoes stand out! They are actually a perfect blend of stand out/ blend in for me, personally. The tiny wedge gives them enough lift and support for comfort (for me) yet they are not super obvious "fashion" sneakers. I love them! 

    Ingunn, you are our capsule queen and I feel we probably are aiming at a very similar wardrobe size, perhaps for similar reasons. It feels moderate and do-able for our climate. After all, at least five of the items on my list of packed clothes were outerwear/ toppers. The idea of one coat per season is sort of impossible to me. 

    Mo - I think you are totally right. For variety, a difference in silhouette or fabrication can be key. Except then you need the parts that "go with" it. Unfrumped has often spoken eloquently on that dilemma! 

    Nicola, I agree that accessories can be super helpful. I made big use of my 3 scarves and various belts on this trip. 

    Unfrumped, I love your phrase "tyrannical versatility." That's really an interesting idea and one worth exploring. I think I perhaps feel somewhat the same. I want some items that can act almost as blank canvases....but I also want a certain proportion of items with real personality. Maybe it comes down to figuring out the balance between essential core and "statement" items in a wardrobe. 

    Laura, thank you. And yes, I think the need for some novelty is similar. Yet I have also had experiences like the one you mentioned in a thread earlier, when you try something new and it ends up feeling unpleasant for some reason -- "excessively decorative" as you said. 

    Thanks, Ceit! 

    Shedev, good to know I'm not the only one. 

    Thanks, all -- appreciate the feedback and it is nice to be back. 

  • Suz replied 10 years ago

    Steph, good point. There is nothing that is not working for me! I guess I just want to ensure I'm not being wasteful or harming the planet any more than absolutely necessary!   :)  And I like the idea of streamlining some areas of my life as much as possible. 

  • Peri replied 10 years ago

    You know what? I don't want to think that hard about it! I don't care to put a number assignment to the amount of things I'm allowed to own. It just seems so arbitrary. The same way the one in, one out seems to me. Why should I have to get rid of something I like to be allowed to buy something new?

    Possibly I feel this way because I don't like to shop and find it stressful, so it's not like I'm overspending and drowning in clothes. I'm just so happy when I do find a few items to buy, that even trying to think of some abstract number goal seems counterproductive. And what if you pass on a bunch of things you could have enjoyed, and then don't like next year's trends and find nothing. That's where I was with pants for a few years when skinny was all the stores carried. Now I've got choice and I'm buying. I'm okay with the possibility that I might overbuy.

    No judgement...I can see why this is important to some. Probably a huge sign that everyone is further along the fashion road than I am. But for me, I'm not thinking about it.

  • Caro in Oz replied 10 years ago

    These are all fab outfits Suz. I just love #8 very tomboy & feminine at the same time :) :)

    I'm with Mo in that the, "how much is enough?" question is the one I am most interested in. I've been properly tracking CPW for the first time this year & the thing I notice is I do wear my clothes a lot. I don't have a problem repeating outfits (usually done with minor variations). I think this is because a lot of my core wardrobe is made up of neutrals. I get my variety is with my footwear & toppers & to a lesser extent accessories.

    So far this autumn I've mostly been wearing of one of five pairs of pants, & one of eight tops. So my "core" wardrobe consists of thirteen pieces,
    not so far from the 10 item wardrobe. Remember there is  A LOT of clothing that doesn't get counted in this system, like toppers, evening wear, tees & exercise clothes etc. etc. I haven't consciously been aiming for any number but what I have been looking at is making sure I get the best value out of ALL my clothes. This includes CPW & joy per wear too. 

    This tracking has really given me a different perspective on how many clothes I actually need, wear & want. My aim is to bring these three things together to form my best possible wardrobe.

  • Suz replied 10 years ago

    Peri, I think I'm in your camp when it comes to actual hard numbers -- as I said in Claire's thread, the idea of confining myself to this or that number (10 or 20) feels arbitrary and that irritates the rebellious teenager in me. But if I don't care about the absolute number, I do care about the principles of stewardship of the earth and moderation. So it's a bit tricky. 

    However, as Angie and Steph have suggested, it's not really wasteful if I am actually wearing the items I have. And I AM wearing them. 

    I think you are wise to buy up when you can find things you love. In your case, your health requirements are such that it's even MORE important. You absolutely need and deserve lovely things that won't make you feel uncomfortable. 

  • replied 10 years ago

    Suz, I'm so glad you're back and that your trip went well. Wasn't it super hot there last year, or am I thinking of a different trip? Anyway, you were well prepared. I think you needed 4 ten item capsules just for that trip. I can't believe how unpredictable the weather was and the variety of your activities. BTW, I remember you taking a trip to see your Mom several years ago that ended up being 3 weeks instead of a long weekend or some such. You had only taken neutrals and missed your colors so much. We should have known then that a minimal wardrobe was not for you. A moderate one is much more in line and still perfectly disciplined considering all of the hats you wear. You are not "muddling along" by any stretch of the imagination, you are leading the way by your shining example.

    I love all of these outfits and you look so authentically Suz. I got to see Vicki and Marley last week, and there is something about Marley's urban sporty style that converges a bit with yours. Perhaps because she was wearing her white highnesses.

    IP.S. I think buying 10 new items at the beginning of each season (either 2 or 4 seasons) and wearing them to rags and getting to start over the next year sounds like fun. Some of my winter things (like jeans and my blazer) will last much longer, partly because our winter is so short.  
      

  • rachylou replied 10 years ago

    I really love #20, btw.

    I think one of the reasons I can only go so low, is that I tend to really love my clothes. I want to be with them for years. 'TIL DEATH FREEKING DO US PART.

    Hehe. Ahem. Sorry. Where was I?

    Oh yes. Anyways, when I did my capsule experiment with my move, I was really wearing stuff often and thus out. It kinda upset me to see my clothes die like that.

  • Runcarla replied 10 years ago

    The common denominators in travel capsules are likely versatility and high comfort as well as happiness factor. You really can't risk experimenting when you've got to live out of a suitcase. The simplest version of your style persona features large.

    Playing in your home closet is different. If an experiment doesn't work, there's a whole closet (even a small one) to riffle through, and less tried and true items to audition. Also, more opportunities to take style risks and stretch the boundaries of your style persona, or experiment with other personas.

    Looks like a fab travel capsule, and enough variety to my eye! BTW, you really do look great in a dress!

  • catgirl replied 10 years ago

    Suz, I'm just dipping my toe back in here so I have nothing brilliant to say, but I did want to commiserate with the push and pull of wanting to want less but actually wanting more.  Not in the sense of wanting endlessly more, but more than I WANT to want.  Sigh.

  • Sara L. replied 10 years ago

    I think you had a great travel wardrobe.  I like the idea of a very small wardrobe, but know that I wouldn't like it in actuality.  Same way that I like the idea of traveling the world and living out of a backpack, but know that in reality I need a home base.

  • Aida replied 10 years ago

    Ok first off #s 2, 14 and 20 just jump off the screen at me, LOVE those two looks. But of course they are all pretty dang fabulous Suz! Whew, had to get that out of the way.

    As I commented in Ingunn's repetition thread, like you I also don't mind having the same people see me in the same things, yet need more variety than a true minimal wardrobe offers. I wonder if perhaps it's an issue of creative stimulus. That while seeing those same pieces is calming for some, for others it can be borderline anxiety inducing. Hm, things to think on...

  • Suz replied 10 years ago

    Aida, thank you. And by the way -- happy belated birthday!! I peeked at the forum one night and saw Angie's message and meant to reply but by the time I could get back the thread had disappeared. It is wonderful to have you back here; you're carefully thought out style adds so much to the forum as do your intelligent comments. 

    Sara, I am with you -- the "idea" of things can sometimes be more fun than the things themselves. 

    AG -- love what you said. "Want to want it" indeed. 

    Carla, really good point about travel wardrobes needing to be FFB type. No room for outfits that don't quite make it. 

    Rachy, it sounds as if you truly love your clothes! Surely that is a good thing, even if it makes purges more difficult. 

    Claire, I do think Marley and I have some similar style denominators. Vicki, too, if it comes to that! Very good point. I would actually love that 10 new items per season and then toss, also -- except then I wouldn't love it, if I had to get rid of my super favourites. So...I guess I just need to be "in betwixt and between."

    Caro, great reminder that a lot of clothing isn't really even counted in these systems. Stuff that really makes the outfits, too. But like you, I would like to get down to a "core" of a few high quality pieces supplemented by others as need arises. 

    Thanks, all! 

  • Angie replied 10 years ago

    It's music to my ears that you wear your clothes, Suz. And when you don't reach for something for a while - it doesn't mean you don't like it anymore. It means that you are in the mood for something else for a little bit. And YES. The weather plays a huge role in what we wear, doesn't it? 

    No more Hi-Ness Cons - not even Amazon? I hope a pair turns up for you. 

    I've moved on from my Cons and am doing the true 2014 thing - and just bought these white Shock Absorbing Walking Sneakers for Diabetics. (I'm not Diabetic). I can't rave enough about them. Very happy feet, and they look better irl. And I could buy them in a narrow width for my low volume feet. I'm wearing them as my fashion sneaks with hidden laces, ankle skin, sportier tops, chinos, cut-offs, dresses, and sporty white bag. First outing today. I bought them for a hot weather walking holiday we have coming up in the Summer. Sandals won't work, and I LOVE to walk. So there you go. I must be kind to my feet and not ruin our holiday. Plus, I can wear my pretty shoes out at night. Cheers to embracing 2014 fashion. I love it. 

  • Joy replied 10 years ago

    Having just finished a trip with a carry-on and also in the process of putting away those items plus my spring things and changing over to summer, I'm following this thread, Claire's and all thoughts on wardrobe size with interest.
    As much as I would like a 10 piece wardrobe, I can't do it yet. Here are some of my thoughts:
    * Like E, I live with extreme temperature changes and would also like a basic grey dress in wool, linen and silk. I need clothing, footwear, and accessories for a variety of situations for each season.
    * While I love wearing neutrals, color is important and I like too many colors. Much of the excitement of a new season is changing colors. Besides, playing with a new-to-me color gives me lots of fun with fashion.
    * Yet I can see that wearing a few things so often that they need to be replaced can mean a chance to introduce new color and silhouettes without guilt and that is very appealing.
    * I need to concentrate on a casual lifestyle.
    * DH is wanting to downsize which means we need a small place with no yard to maintain and getting rid of lots of stuff including clothes. I need to learn to do with less of everything. With help and inspiration from the YLF community I feel that I will be able to do this.
    Suz, your outfits all look fabulous. I especially like those with the blue scarf.
    ETA: Angie, I am so excited about your new walking shoes and can't wait to see how you work them into outfits!

  • Runcarla replied 10 years ago

    First Birks, and now white athletic shoes...I think normcore is trending!

  • Alassë replied 10 years ago

    Splendid, a summary Suz post to read! :) Thanks for writing it all down for us, and showing us your pictures. I hear you on wanting a minimal wardrobe, but seeming to use the majority of one's medium-size closet. No ideas unless maybe we need to let go of the desire to be super-minimalists and accept the reality that we (like Angie) are lovers of a disciplined closet, which is not quite the same thing. Somehow 10 items seems better, but why the pull? Especially when we know we couldn't take the lack of variety....

  • Jaime replied 10 years ago

    Welcome home Suz! I am sure your family is glad to have you back and so are we! Your post was very thought provoking (as usual). But first, I must say, you look wonderful in all of your outfits. I really love the one with other people to see you in context, but as I clicked through I was so impressed with the consistently stylish looks with just enough variety to keep things interesting. I am far from a 10 piece wardrobe, but I do admire and aspire to keeping things at a high level of style and not wearing second bests. You are clearly not doing that! 

    Between this post, Ingunn's and Claire's I think I have my food for fashion thought this weekend!

  • Suz replied 10 years ago

    Thank you all! Angie, that is so much fun about the sneakers! I was actually looking at something similar and wondering if I dared. I still might add a similar pair. I think Carla is right. Normcore! 

    But tonight I actually FOUND a pair of Hi-Ness in Canada in my approximate size and ordered. I know the wedge is not quite the thing this year but this wedge is tiny and it is SO MUCH KINDER to my feet than a flat shoe. Plus, I love the iconic style of the Cons. 

    This pair is a half size bigger than the ones I presently own, but that will allow thicker socks and also shrinkage (I think mine shrunk in the wash, despite the care I took with them.) I'll probably wear them to death for the rest of the summer and then look for a new version next year. 

    Alasse, I love what you said about a disciplined wardrobe. I think that's the real goal for me. And i am pretty much there. 

    Joy, isn't that blue scarf beautiful? It is a silk and cashmere pashima sent by a friend. It turned out to be so incredibly useful in the frigid temperatures there. 

    Shevia, thank you. I definitely prefer to wear my favourites rather than second bests. 

  • E replied 10 years ago

    Yeah, a tiny simple closet isn't for me either. I love variety! Even when no one sees me, which is frequently, I dress differently just to please myself. Perhaps the question is, how much variety satisfies the creative urge without causing guilt? I don't actually feel guilty about my current closet size, as it's full of clothes I love. I do feel guilty that I'm not quite satisfied with it though, and that I seem to easily find new categories to expand on/explore via thrifting.

    I *love* RachyLou's point too: I want enough clothes that I'm not putting a huge amount of wear and tear on any individual item so that it suddenly dies. Logically, I know 10 wears in one month is the same time in the garment as 10 wear over 2-3 years, but emotionally I'd rather do the latter.

  • Adelfa replied 10 years ago

    Suz, this is so funny--for the last couple of days I've been dreaming up a post on how I think I want minimalism but I don't really! I have been buying (for me) a lot of clothes. Nothing I can't afford. I have been enjoying my purchases tremendously! So I am definitely having fun with fashion :-)

    Welcome back!

  • E replied 10 years ago

    Now I've looked at all of the photos, and you're looking so perfect. Your closet is definitely working for you! :D And are those elk?!

  • JAileen replied 10 years ago

    I always love seeing your outfits. I love these, especially the ones with stripes.

    Regarding wearing the same things over and over, I think at home people expect a person would have a reasonable wardrobe and laundering facilities. And if they're wearing the same thing two days in a row it must mean either they don't have enough clothes, or they're not very clean - they're wearing the same thing as yesterday without washing it. But when someone is traveling or away from home and there's the same scenario, wearing the same thing two days in a row - well, a person can't be expected to bring one's entire wardrobe, and in fact the lighter one travels, the more admired one is. For me, I think I don't want people to think I would wear dirty clothes. I do, though! When we're doing a project around the house or in the garden, I might wear the same filthy jeans multiple days!

    BTW, I looked up the Daily Connoisseur (Jennifer L. Scott) who promotes the ten item wardrobe. I watched a few videos, and one of her ten item capsules had fourteen items. Her fourteen items were really nice, though, but didn't include any tee shirts. She said she wouldn't wear any of the fourteen items to take her kids to the park. So I don't understand what her ten/fourteen item wardrobe means, if it doesn't include everything she wears. My wardrobe count would be a lot smaller if I didn't include everything, too.

  • Mona replied 10 years ago

    Great analysis, Suz. You look smoking hot in that dress. It is nice to know that you had a great time and the clothes worked out for you.
    I am surprised to know that your cons need replacement. You must have worn them a lot more than I did last summer. What colour are your new ones?
    I wore my cons with white jeans to go out for drinks with friends and one of them commented that I was dressed up like her 13 years old daughter o_O. Not sure what she meant by that.
    Anyways, back to the point here. Claire's post was very thought provoking for me and although I love the concept of minimal wardrobe, I find it so hard to implement. I love adding variety to my outfits and get bored easily by wearing the same things again and again. In her post, Claire said that sometimes she gets bored or gets excited about a new item and goes shopping (although most of the time she comes back empty handed). I think this is important. You have to give yourself permission to go shopping and buy something new every once in a while.
    Also, I think taking baby steps towards something like this would be helpful. I have purged almost more than half of my closet since last year and have added only very few new items so I think I am slowly building a small wardrobe. Will I ever get to only 10 items? No, but I have learnt a lot from Claire's posts and analysis.

  • Suz replied 10 years ago

    Thanks, Mona. I wore my Cons quite a lot last summer (and walked a lot in them)  but  they were still in pretty good shape until  the trip. Then, I wore them literally every day on this trip, walked in them for upwards of 5 miles a day, and also washed them in an probably-not-terribly gentle washing machine. I didn't dry them in the dryer, but they are starting to fray at the edges of the tongues anyway and they look less than pristine from all the walking on dusty and/or muddy paths. They weren't my hiking shoes (I had proper gear shoes for that) but I did wear them when walking across town. So they took a genuine beating. CPW at this point is definitely less than 50 cents. 

    The new ones are white, too! 

    As for dressing like a 13 year old -- well, my daughter borrowed my shoes to wear to her eighth grade grad last year, so maybe there's truth in it. Oh well! We're just young at heart. 

  • Janet replied 10 years ago

    Welcome back, Suz! We missed you. :-) It sounds like you had a great time and your capsule served you well, but boy do I know the feeling of hugging my closet when I get home!

    Interesting musings, too. I am with you in many respects. I love that we have some true minimalists here who look so amazing in their very small wardrobes. Part of me would love to do that. But it's not a very large part. ;-) I also crave variety and "the new" and have way too much fun with that part of fashion to give it up. Like Angie, I would find a very small wardrobe a punishment.

    Peri, this resonated with me: "You know what? I don't want to think that hard about it! I don't care to put a number assignment to the amount of things I'm allowed to own. It just seems so arbitrary. The same way the one in, one out seems to me. Why should I have to get rid of something I like to be allowed to buy something new?"

    I'm right there with you in the first part of that paragraph. I sometimes think about counting the items in my closet when these number topics come up, and then I'm like, "why?" It doesn't matter if I have space for them, I wear them, and I love them. If one of those criteria does not apply, then the numbers start to matter.

    I DO try to do one-in, one-out though. That's because I do tend to shop too much, and it helps keep me in check. Knowing that I'll need to make space for a new item makes me evaluate new purchases with a tougher eye. I have two items in a bag for returns as we speak because I don't like them more than the items in my closet they would be displacing.

    But back to the main topic at hand -- I love that there are so many approaches to wardrobe management and mixing here on the forum, and that all are celebrated and respected. Rock on, ladies!

  • Eliza replied 10 years ago

    Welcome home, Suz. You look amazing in all of your trip photos.

    I understand the tension between efficiency and conscious dressing, while simultaneously seeking variety and the opportunity to express our creativity through experimenting with new options. I like to shop for most wardrobe items, enjoy having some current looks and get bored when things are extra repetitive due to travel or circumstances. I also need some total peace of mind, flattering "go to" ensembles that are no brainers. What I don't want is a collection of clothing items that I am not able to deploy in service of my fashion goals. They take up space and interfere with, rather than enhance, the fashion experience.

    It seems you may be farther along with your style evolution than you can imagine! You wear all of your clothes, look great whether working from home, doing public speaking or attending formal events, and are having fun. Plus, your closet functions. At this point, maybe it's about embracing all that works for you and continuing to understand what makes each item work. I have found your "needs assessments" season by season very insightful and incisive. Cheers to you!

    Thanks for the thread- I grapple with similar issues. This season I have been purchasing up a storm, because so much is to my liking and I was due for some refreshing. It has felt both wonderful and a bit indulgent. Now I must sort through my closet to eliminate the items that are less appealing. I would have done that bit by bit, but for an injury. Now it's a bit overwhelming, but will be liberating when done.

  • Beth Ann replied 10 years ago

    Welcome back (although it's hard to wish someone to leave Banff)!

    You followed the second rule of YLF by wearing the heck out of your clothes!  All of these look polished, modern and chic.  Fits and proportions make all the difference!  I'm particularly struck by the fabness of that KK dress on you!  Wowza!  Also, I can see at a glance that you put your scarves and the semi-tuck to excellent use!

    Perhaps you can make a "Hug my Closet" capsule?

  • Suz replied 10 years ago

    LOVE that idea, Beth Ann!! But you know what? That would pretty much be my entire closet!  :) 

    And thank you for your generous thoughts, Eliza. I am glad you've treated yourself to some great new items! 

  • April replied 10 years ago

    I don't have the temperament for a micro-wardrobe.  Modestly sized, but not micro.  It doesn't mesh with my anxious nature.  Even choosing pieces for travel is an ordeal, which is why I really admire your systematic approach, Suz.  Very reassuring to someone like me to know that it CAN be done well.

  • Angela K replied 10 years ago

    Simple is a nice concept, but for me variety is the spice of life.  I would die of boredom with only 10 items to wear and I don't think that I could make them work for all the different areas of my life.  I do think it would be great to be able to master this! So organized, neat, efficient, none of which would be descriptions of me! ;)

  • Angie replied 10 years ago

    I agree that the 10 Item Wardrobe Philosophy from Jennifer. L. Scott is a stretch at best. It's nowhere near 10 items - to JAileen's point. 

    Suz, I don't want to further hijack your thread so we can talk white sneaks on another thread if you like. I LOVE Cons. My best. My feet just became too fussy for them though. So..... for me...... it was "Next". I'm glad you found your Cons last night. Brilliant. xo

  • Neel replied 10 years ago

    Oh Suz! I was wondering where you were :). Noticed a few sporadic responses and thought life must have gotten busy. Welcome back!

    Of everything that you have written I only wondered why you would want a 10 item wardrobe when clearly you love everything you own. I am not even there yet where I could hug every piece in my closet and say *I love you*! Like Angie, I have the *no spilling over other closets* rule. I have too many clothes and I am actually kind of ashamed to admit *how much*! When it goes over the limit, I purge. I am in the process of curating my wardrobe.

    You look killer gorgeous in your dress. All the other outfits are perfection too! A 10/10 for the entire trip is brilliant in itself. You should pat your back Suz :)

  • Karie replied 10 years ago

    Suz, I have been thinking about this very topic lately, and wondering how much is enough in my own wardrobe. While I could never handle having only a ten item wardrobe, I have noticed, thanks to my project of taking an outfit photo every day this school year, that I am reaching for several items over and over and other items are getting very little wear. And you know what? Most of the little-worn items are of the not-as-well-made-cheaper-fabrication variety. Both my BCBG blazers? Try and pry them off me. My bazillion button "middle of the road" button down shirts? Haul 'em outta here. I'd trade the whole lot for one well made button down like Angie was wearing in Boston.

    I love about half my closet, and you know what's coming next - the half that I love is largely made up of post-YLF items. 

    But now on to the important stuff - I'm glad you're back from your trip (hope if was fab) and back to posting regularly. Your outfits are all gorgeous, but my fav is that fantabulous dress in #20 and #21!

You need to be logged in to comment